Paper detail

The escape fraction of ionizing photons from high redshift galaxies from data-constrained reionization models

The escape fraction, f_{esc}, of ionizing photons from high-redshift galaxies is a key parameter to understand cosmic reionization and star formation history. Yet, in spite of many efforts, it remains largely uncertain. We propose a novel, semi-empirical approach based on a simultaneous match of the most recently determined Luminosity Functions (LF) of galaxies in the redshift range 6 \leq z \leq 10 with reionization models constrained by a large variety of experimental data. From this procedure we obtain the evolution of the best-fit values of f_{esc} along with their 2-sigma limits. We find that, averaged over the galaxy population, (i) the escape fraction increases from f_{esc} = 0.068_{-0.047}^{+0.054} at z=6 to f_{esc} = 0.179_{-0.132}^{+0.331} at z=8; (ii) at z=10 we can only put a lower limit of f_{esc} > 0.146. Thus, although errors are large, there is an indication of a 2.6 times increase of the average escape fraction from z=6 to z=8 which might partially release the "starving reionization" problem.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.