Paper detail

The erratic path to coalescence of LISA massive black hole binaries in sub-pc resolution simulations of smooth circumnuclear gas disks

We report on high-resolution simulations that explore the orbital decay of massive black hole (MBH) pairs with masses between $10^5$ and $10^7 M_{\odot}$ embedded in a circumnuclear gas disk (CND). An adiabatic equation of state is adopted, with a range of adiabatic indices, which maintains a smooth flow. Mergers between MBHs in this mass range would be detectable by the upcoming Laser Inteferometer Space Antenna (LISA). The orbital evolution is followed from the CND scale ($100$~pc) down to separations of $0.1$--$0.01$~pc at which a circumbinary disk (CBD) could form. The decay is erratic and strongly dependent on the gas flow within the disk, that ultimately determines the net torques experienced by the sinking MBH. Overall, we can identify three different evolutionary stages: (i) an initially slow decay that leads to no significant change in the orbital angular momentum, resulting in some circularization; (ii) a fast migration phase in which the orbital angular momentum decreases rapidly; and (iii) a final, very slow decay phase, in which orbital angular momentum can even increase, and a CBD can form. The fast migration phase owes to disk-driven torques originating primarily from the co-orbital region of the secondary MBH, at a distance of 1--3 Hill radii. We find strong analogies with fast Type III migration for massive planets in protoplanetary disks. The CBD forms only when the decay rate becomes small enough to allow it enough time to carve a cavity around the primary MBH, at scales $\lesssim 1$~pc; when this happens, the MBH separation nearly stalls in our higher-resolution run. We suggest an empirically modified gap-opening criterion that takes into account such timescale effects as well as other deviations from standard assumptions made in the literature. [Abriged]

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.