Paper detail

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): X-ray properties of Subaru optically-selected clusters

We present the results of a systematic X-ray analysis of optically rich galaxy clusters detected by the Subaru HSC survey in the eROSITA eFEDS field. Through a joint analysis of SRG/eROSITA and Subaru/HSC surveys, we aim to study the dynamical status of the optically selected clusters and derive the cluster scaling relations. The sample consists of 43 optically selected galaxy clusters with a richness $>40$ in $0.16<z<0.89$. We systematically analyzed the X-ray images and spectra using the eROSITA data. We identified the BCG using the optical and far-infrared databases. We evaluated the cluster&#39;s dynamical status by measuring the offset between the X-ray peak and BCG position, the gas concentration, and the number of galaxy-density peaks. We studied the luminosity-temperature and mass-luminosity relations based on eROSITA X-ray spectra and HSC weak-lensing data analyses. Based on the these measurements, the fraction of relaxed clusters is $2(<39)$%, which is smaller than that of the X-ray-selected cluster samples. After correcting for a selection bias due to the richness cut, we obtained a shallow $L-T$ slope of $2.1\pm0.5$, which is consistent with the predictions of the self-similar model and the baseline model incorporating a mass-concentration relation. The $L-M$ slope of $1.5\pm0.3$ agrees with the above theoretical models and that of the shear-selected clusters in the eFEDs field. Our analysis of high-richness optical clusters yields a small fraction of relaxed clusters and a shallow slope for the luminosity-temperature relation. This suggests that the average X-ray properties of the optical clusters are likely to be different from those observed in the X-ray samples. Thus, the joint eROSITA and HSC observations are a powerful tool in extending the analysis to a larger sample and understanding the selection effect with a view to establish cluster scaling relations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.