Paper detail

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS). The stellar counterparts of eROSITA sources identified by machine learning and Bayesian algorithms

Stars are ubiquitous X-ray emitters and will be a substantial fraction of the X-ray sources detected in the on-going all-sky survey performed by the eROSITA instrument aboard the Spectrum Roentgen Gamma (SRG) observatory. We use the X-ray sources in the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) field observed during the SRG performance verification phase to investigate different strategies to identify the stars among other source categories. We focus here on Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Bayesian approaches, and our approaches are based on a cross-match with the Gaia catalog, which will eventually contain counterparts to virtually all stellar eROSITA sources. We estimate that 2060 stars are among the eFEDS sources based on the geometric match distance distribution, and we identify the 2060 most likely stellar sources with the SVM and Bayesian methods, the latter being named HamStars in the eROSITA context. Both methods reach completeness and reliability percentages of almost 90%, and the agreement between both methods is, incidentally, also about 90%. Knowing the true number of stellar sources allowed us to derive association probabilities $p_{ij}$ for the SVM method similar to the Bayesian method so that one can construct samples with defined completeness and reliability properties using appropriate cuts in $p_{ij}$. The thus identified stellar sources show the typical characteristics known for magnetically active stars, specifically, they are generally compatible with the saturation level, show a large spread in activity for stars of spectral F to G, and have comparatively high fractional X-ray luminosities for later spectral types.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.