Paper detail

The equivalent refraction index for the acoustic scattering by many small obstacles: with error estimates

Let $M$ be the number of bounded and Lipschitz regular obstacles $D_j, j:=1, ..., M$ having a maximum radius $a$, $a<<1$, located in a bounded domain $Ω$ of $\mathbb{R}^3$. We are concerned with the acoustic scattering problem with a very large number of obstacles, as $M:=M(a):=O(a^{-1})$, $a\rightarrow 0$, when they are arbitrarily distributed in $Ω$ with a minimum distance between them of the order $d:=d(a):=O(a^t)$ with $t$ in an appropriate range. We show that the acoustic farfields corresponding to the scattered waves by this collection of obstacles, taken to be soft obstacles, converge uniformly in terms of the incident as well the propagation directions, to the one corresponding to an acoustic refraction index as $a\rightarrow 0$. This refraction index is given as a product of two coefficients $C$ and $K$, where the first one is related to the geometry of the obstacles (precisely their capacitance) and the second one is related to the local distribution of these obstacles. In addition, we provide explicit error estimates, in terms of $a$, in the case when the obstacles are locally the same (i.e. have the same capacitance, or the coefficient $C$ is piecewise constant) in $Ω$ and the coefficient $K$ is H$\ddot{\mbox{o}}$lder continuous. These approximations can be applied, in particular, to the theory of acoustic materials for the design of refraction indices by perforation using either the geometry of the holes, i.e. the coefficient $C$, or their local distribution in a given domain $Ω$, i.e. the coefficient $K$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.