Paper detail

The equation $|p^x \pm q^y| = c$ in nonnegative $x$, $y$

We improve earlier work on the title equation (where $p$ and $q$ are primes and $c$ is a positive integer) by allowing $x$ and $y$ to be zero as well as positive. Earlier work on the title equation showed that, with listed exceptions, there are at most two solutions in positive integers $x$ and $y$, using elementary methods. Here we show that, with listed exceptions, there are at most two solutions in nonnegative integers $x$ and $y$, but the proofs are dependent on nonelementary work of Mignotte, Bennett, Luca, and Szalay. In order to provide some of our results with purely elementary proofs, we give short elementary proofs of the results of Luca, made possible by an elementary lemma which also has an application to the familiar equation $x^2 + C = y^n$. We also give shorter simpler proofs of Szalay's results. A summary of results on the number of solutions to the generalized Pillai equation $(-1)^u r a^x + (-1)^v s b^y = c$ is also given.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.