Paper detail

The EOS/Resolution Conspiracy: Convergence in Proto-Planetary Collision Simulations

We investigate how the choice of equation of state (EOS) and resolution conspire to affect the outcomes of giant impact (GI) simulations. We focus on the simple case of equal mass collisions of two Earth-like $0.5\,M_\oplus$ proto-planets showing that the choice of EOS has a profound impact on the outcome of such collisions as well as on the numerical convergence with resolution. In simulations where the Tillotson EOS is used, impacts generate an excess amount of vapour due to the lack of a thermodynamically consistent treatment of phase transitions and mixtures. In oblique collisions this enhances the artificial angular momentum (AM) transport from the planet to the circum-planetary disc reducing the planet's rotation period over time. Even at a resolution of $1.3 \times 10^6$ particles the result is not converged. In head-on collisions the lack of a proper treatment of the solid/liquid-vapour phase transition allows the bound material to expand to very low densities which in turn results in very slow numerical convergence of the critical specific impact energy for catastrophic disruption $Q_{RD}^*$ with increasing resolution as reported in prior work. The simulations where ANEOS is used for oblique impacts are already converged at a modest resolution of $10^5$ particles, while head-on collisions converge when they evidence the post-shock formation of a dense iron-rich ring, which promotes gravitational re-accumulation of material. Once sufficient resolution is reached to resolve the liquid-vapour phase transition of iron in the ANEOS case, and this ring is resolved, the value of $Q_{RD}^*$ has then converged.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.