Paper detail

The environment of weak emission-line quasars

The nature of weak emission-line quasars (WLQs) is probed by comparing the Baldwin effect (BEff) in WLQs and normal quasars (QSOs). We selected 81 high-redshift (z>2.2) and 2 intermediate-redshift (z=1.66 and 1.89) WLQs. Their rest-frame equivalent widths (EWs) of the C IV emission-line and their Eddington ratio were obtained from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 (SDSS DR7) Quasar Catalogue or from Diamond-Stanic et al. We compare the parameters of WLQs with these of 81 normal quasars from Bright Quasar Survey (BQS) and 155 radio-quiet and radio-intermediate quasars detected by SDSS and Chandra. The influence of the Eddington ratio, Lbol/Ledd, and the X-ray to optical luminosity ratio,alpha_ox, on the BEff is analysed. We find that WLQs follow a different relationship on the EW(CIV)-Lbol/Ledd plane than normal quasars. This relationship disagrees with the super-Eddington hypothesis. The weakness/absence of emission-lines in WLQs does not seem to be caused by their extremely soft ionizing continuum but by low covering factor (Omega) of their broad line region (BLR). Comparing emission-line intensities indicates that the ratios of high-ionization line and low-ionization line regions (i.e. Omega_(HIL)/Omega_(LIL)) are lower in WLQs than in normal QSOs. The covering factor of the regions producing C IV and Lyalpha emission-lines are similar in both WLQs and QSOs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.