Paper detail

The Environment of AGNs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

We present the observed fraction of galaxies with an Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) as a function of environment in the Early Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Using 4921 galaxies between 0.05 <= z <= 0.095, and brighter than M_r* = -20.0 (or M* +1.45), we find at least ~ 20% of these galaxies possess an unambiguous detection of an AGN, but this fraction could be as high as ~40% after we model the ambiguous emission line galaxies in our sample. We have studied the environmental dependence of galaxies using the the distance to the 10^th nearest neighbor. As expected, we observe that the fraction of star--forming galaxies decreases with density, while the fraction of passive galaxies increases with density. In contrast, the fraction of galaxies with an AGN remains constant from the cores of galaxy clusters to the rarefied field population. We conclude that the presence of an AGN is independent of the disk component of a galaxy. Our analyses are robust against measurement error, definition of an AGN, aperture bias, stellar absorption, survey geometry and signal--to--noise. Our observations are consistent with the hypothesis that a supermassive black hole resides in the bulge of all massive galaxies and ~40% of these black holes are seen as AGNs in our sample. A high fraction of local galaxies with an AGN suggests that either the mean lifetime of these AGNs is longer than previously thought (>10^8 years), or that the AGN burst more often than expected; ~40 times over the redshift range of our sample.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.