Paper detail

The environment and redshift dependence of accretion onto dark matter halos and subhalos

A dark-matter-only Horizon Project simulation is used to investigate the environment- and redshift- dependence of accretion onto both halos and subhalos. These objects grow in the simulation via mergers and via accretion of diffuse non-halo material, and we measure the combined signal from these two modes of accretion. It is found that the halo accretion rate varies less strongly with redshift than predicted by the Extended Press-Schechter (EPS) formalism and is dominated by minor-merger and diffuse accretion events at z=0, for all halos. These latter growth mechanisms may be able to drive the radio-mode feedback hypothesised for recent galaxy-formation models, and have both the correct accretion rate and form of cosmological evolution. The low redshift subhalo accretors in the simulation form a mass-selected subsample safely above the mass resolution limit that reside in the outer regions of their host, with ~70% beyond their host's virial radius, where they are probably not being significantly stripped of mass. These subhalos accrete, on average, at higher rates than halos at low redshift and we argue that this is due to their enhanced clustering at small scales. At cluster scales, the mass accretion rate onto halos and subhalos at low redshift is found to be only weakly dependent on environment and we confirm that at z~2 halos accrete independently of their environment at all scales, as reported by other authors. By comparing our results with an observational study of black hole growth, we support previous suggestions that at z>1, dark matter halos and their associated central black holes grew coevally, but show that by the present day, dark matter halos could be accreting at fractional rates that are up to a factor 3-4 higher than their associated black holes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.