Paper detail

The entrainment and energetics of turbulent plumes in a confined space

We analyse the entrainment and energetics of equal and opposite axisymmetric turbulent air plumes in a vertically confined space at a Rayleigh number of $1.24\times 10^{7}$ using theory and direct numerical simulation. On domains of sufficiently large aspect ratio, the steady state consists of turbulent plumes penetrating an interface between two layers of approximately uniform buoyancy. As described by Baines and Turner (J. Fluid Mech. vol. 37, 1969, pp. 51-80), upon penetrating the interface the flow in each plume becomes forced and behaves like a constant-momentum jet, due to a reduction in its mean buoyancy relative to the local environment. To observe the behaviour of the plumes we partition the domain into sub-domains corresponding to each plume. Domains of relatively small aspect ratio produce a single primary mean-flow circulation between the sub-domains that is maintained by entrainment into the plumes. At larger aspect ratios the mean flow between the sub-domains bifurcates, indicating the existence of a secondary circulation within each layer associated with entrainment into the jets. To study the flow's energetics we use a local definition of available potential energy (APE). For plumes with Gaussian velocity and buoyancy profiles, the theory we develop suggests that the kinetic energy dissipation is split equally between the jets and the plumes and, collectively, accounts for almost half of the input of APE at the boundaries. In contrast, $1/4$ of the APE dissipation and background potential energy (BPE) production occurs in the jets, with the remaining $3/4$ occurring in the plumes. These bulk theoretical predictions agree with observations of BPE production from simulations to within $1\%$ and form the basis of a similarity solution that models the vertical dependence of APE dissipation and BPE production.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.