Paper detail

The enigmatic central star of the planetary nebula PRTM 1

The central star of the planetary nebula PRTM 1 (PN G243.8-37.1) was previously found to be variable by M. Pena and colleagues. As part of a larger programme aimed towards finding post common-envelope binary central stars we have monitored the central star of PRTM 1 spectroscopically and photometrically for signs of variability. Over a period of ~3 months we find minimal radial velocity (<10 km/s) and photometric (< 0.2 mag) variability. The data suggest a close binary nucleus can be ruled out at all but the lowest orbital inclinations, especially considering the spherical morphology of the nebula which we reveal for the first time. Although the current data strongly support the single star hypothesis, the true nature of the central star of PRTM 1 remains enigmatic and will require further radial velocity monitoring at higher resolution to rule out a close binary. If in the odd case that it is a close binary, it would be the first such case in a spherical planetary nebula, in contradiction to current thinking.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.