Paper detail

The Energy Sources of Double-peaked superluminous supernova PS1-12cil and luminous supernova SN 2012aa

In this paper, we present the study for the energy reservoir powering the light curves (LCs) of PS1-12cil and SN 2012aa which are superluminous and luminous supernovae (SNe), respectively. The multi-band and bolometric LCs of these two SNe show unusual secondary bumps after the main peaks. The two-peaked LCs cannot be explained by any simple energy-source models (e.g., the $^{56}$Ni cascade decay model, the magnetar spin-down model, and the ejecta-circumstellar medium interaction model). Therefore, we employ the $^{56}$Ni plus ejecta-circumstellar medium (CSM) interaction (CSI) model, the magnetar plus CSI model, and the double CSI model to fit their bolometric LCs, and find that both these two SNe can be explained by the double CSI model and the magnetar plus CSI model. Based on the modeling, we calculate the the time when the shells were expelled by the progenitors: provided that they were powered by double ejecta-shell CSI, the inner and outer shells might be expelled $\sim 0.2-3.6$ and $\sim 2-25$ years before the explosions of the SNe, respectively; the shells were expelled $\sim 2-20$ years before the explosions of the SNe if they were powered by magnetars plus CSI.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.