Paper detail

The energy of waves in the photosphere and lower chromosphere: II. Intensity statistics

We investigate the statistics of the intensity distributions as function of the wavelength for Ca II H and the CA II IR line at 854.2 nm to estimate the energy content. We derived the intensity variations at different heights of the solar atmosphere as given by the line wings and line cores of the two spectral lines. We converted the observed intensities to absolute energy units employing reference profiles calculated in NLTE. We also converted the observed intensity fluctuations to brightness temperatures assuming LTE. The rms fluctuations of the emitted intensity are about 0.6 (1.2) W/m2 ster pm near the core of the Ca IR line (Ca II H), corresponding to intensity fluctuations of about 20% (30%). For the line wing, we find rms values of about 0.3 W/ m2 ster pm for both lines, corresponding to relative fluctuations below 5%. The rms shows a local minimum for wavelengths forming at about 130 km height, but otherwise increases from the wing to the core. The rms brightness temperature fluctuations are below 100 K for the photosphere and up to 500 K in the chromosphere. The skewness of the intensity distributions is close to zero in the outer line wing and positive throughout the rest of the spectrum. The skewness shows a pronounced maximum on locations with photospheric magnetic fields for wavelengths in between the line wing and the line core, and a global maximum at the very core for both magnetic and field-free locations. The energy content of the intensity fluctuations is insufficient to create a similar temperature rise in the chromosphere as predicted in most reference models of the solar atmosphere. The enhanced skewness between photosphere and lower solar chromosphere on magnetic locations indicates a mechanism which solely acts on magnetized plasma.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.