Paper detail

The energy dependence of the multiplicity moments at the LHC

In this work, from the experimental data we evaluate the first C-moments of the multiplicity distributions recently measured in proton-proton collisions at the LHC and compare them with the predictions of two models: the Kharzeev-Levin model and the Bialas-Praszalowicz model. We divide the data into three sets according to their phase space coverage: I: $p_T > 100 $ MeV and $|η|< 0.5$; II: $p_T > 100 $ MeV and $|η|< 2.4$ and II: $p_T > 500 $ MeV and $|η|< 2.4$. The mean multiplicity grows with the energy according to a power law and the power is different for each set. The $C_n$ moments grow continuously with the energy, slowly in set I and faster in the other sets. Except for KL in set II, both models reproduce the main features of the data. The negative binomial parameter $k$ decreases continuously with the energy and there is no sign of change in this behavior.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.