Paper detail

The energy conservation for the Navier-Stokes equations on the Lipschitz domains

In this paper, we consider the energy conservation of the Leray-Hopf weak solution $u$ to the Navier-Stokes equations on bounded domains $Ω$ with Lipschitz boundary $\partialΩ$. We prove that although the boundary effect appears, the Shinbrot's condition $u\in L^q_{loc}((0,T];L^p(Ω))$ with $\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{2},p\geq 4$ still guarantees the validity of energy conservation of $u$, no boundary layer assumptions are required when dealing with domains with Lipschitz boundary. Compared to the existed methods, our critical strategies are that we first separate the mollification of weak solution from the boundary effect by considering non-standard local energy equality and transform the boundary effects into the estimates of the gradient of the cut-off functions, then by establishing a sharp $L^2L^2$ estimate for pressure $P$ and using the zero boundary condition, we obtain global energy equality by taking suitable cut-off functions. Our result provides a unified method to deal with domains with or without boundary and improves the corresponding results in \cite{C-L,Yu}.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.