Paper detail

The Emission Line Properties of Gravitationally-lensed 1.5 < z < 5 Galaxies

We present and analyse near-infrared spectroscopy for a sample of 28 gravitationally- lensed star-forming galaxies in the redshift range 1.5 < z < 5, observed mostly with the Keck II telescope. With typical magnifications of ~1.5-4 magnitudes, our survey provides a valuable census of star formation rates, gas-phase metallicities and dynamical masses for a representative sample of low luminosity galaxies seen at a formative period in cosmic history. We find less evolution in the mass-metallicity relation compared to earlier work that focused on more luminous systems with z - 2-3, especially in the low mass (- 10^9 Msol) where our sample is - 0.25 dex more metal-rich. We interpret this offset as a result of the lower star formation rates (typically a factor of -10 lower) for a given stellar mass in our sub-luminous systems. Taking this effect into account, we conclude our objects are consistent with a fundamental metallicity relation recently proposed from unlensed observations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.