Paper detail

The Efficacy of Microaneurysms Detection With and Without Vessel Segmentation in Color Retinal Images

Computer-Aided Diagnosis systems are required to extract suitable information about retina and its changes. In particular, identifying objects of interest such as lesions and anatomical structures from the retinal images is a challenging and iterative process that is doable by image processing approaches. Microaneurysm (MAs) are one set of these changes caused by diabetic retinopathy (DR). In fact, MAs detection is the main step for the identification of DR in the retinal images analysis. The objective of this study is to apply an automated method for the detection of MAs and compare the results of detection with and without vessel segmentation and masking either in the normal or abnormal image. The steps for detection and segmentation are as follows. In the first step, we did preprocessing, by using top-hat transformation. Our main processing was included applying Radon transform, to segment the vessels and masking them. At last, we did the MAs detection step using a combination of Laplacian-of-Gaussian and Convolutional Neural Networks. To evaluate the accuracy of our proposed method, we compare the output of our proposed method with the ground truth that collected by ophthalmologists. With vessel segmentation, our algorithm found a sensitivity of more than 85% in the detection of MAs with 11 false-positive rates per image for 100 color images in a local retinal database and 20 images of a public dataset (DRIVE). Also without vessel segmentation, our automated algorithm finds a sensitivity of about 90% in the detection of MAs with 73 false positives per image for all 120 images of two databases. In conclusion, with vessel segmentation, we have acceptable sensitivity and specificity, as a necessary step in some diagnostic algorithm for retinal pathology.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.