Paper detail

The effects of stellar winds of fast-rotating massive stars in the earliest phases of the chemical enrichment of the Galaxy

We use the growing data sets of very-metal-poor stars to study the impact of stellar winds of fast rotating massive stars on the chemical enrichment of the early Galaxy. We use an inhomogeneous chemical evolution model for the Galactic halo to predict both the mean trend and scatter of C/O and N/O. In one set of models, we assume that massive stars enrich the interstellar medium during both the stellar wind and supernovae phases. In the second set, we consider that in the earliest phases (Z <10^-8), stars with masses above 40 Msun only enrich the interstellar medium via stellar winds, collapsing directly into black holes. We predict a larger scatter in the C/O and N/O ratios at low metallicities when allowing the more massive fast-rotating stars to contribute to the chemical enrichment only via stellar winds. The latter assumption, combined with the stochasticity in the star formation process in the primordial Galactic halo can explain the wide spread observed in the N/O and C/O ratios in normal very-metal-poor stars. For chemical elements with stellar yields that depend strongly on initial mass (and rotation) such as C, N, and neutron capture elements, within the range of massive stars, a large scatter is expected once the stochastic enrichment of the early interstellar medium is taken into account. We also find that stellar winds of fast rotators mixed with interstellar medium gas are not enough to explain the large CNO enhancements found in most of the carbon-enhanced very-metal-poor stars. In particular, this is the case of the most metal-poor star known to date, HE 1327-2326, for which our models predict lower N enhancements than observed when assuming a mixture of stellar winds and interstellar medium. We suggest that these carbon-enhanced very metal-poor stars were formed from almost pure stellar wind material, without dilution with the pristine interstellar medium.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.