Paper detail

The Effects of Stator Compliance, Backs Steps, Temperature, and Clockwise Rotation on the Torque-Speed Curve of Bacterial Flagellar Motor

Rotation of a single bacterial flagellar motor is powered by multiple stators tethered to the cell wall. In a "power-stroke" model the observed independence of the speed at low load on the number of stators is explained by a torque-dependent stepping mechanism independent of the strength of the stator tethering spring. On the other hand, in models that depend solely on the stator spring to explain the observed behavior, exceedingly small stator spring constants are required. To study the dynamics of the motor driven by external forces (such as those exerted by an optical tweezer), back-stepping is introduced when stators are driven far out of equilibrium. Our model with back-stepping reproduces the observed absence of a barrier to backward rotation, as well the behaviors in the high-speed negative-torque regime. Recently measured temperature dependence of the motor speed near zero load (Yuan & Berg 2010 Biophys J) is explained quantitatively by the thermally activated stepping rates in our model. Finally, we suggest that the general mechanical properties of all molecular motors (linear and rotary), characterized by their force(torque)-speed curve, can be determined by their power-stroke potentials and the dependence of the stepping rates on the mechanical state of the motor (force or speed). The torque-speed curve for the clockwise rotating flagellar motor has been observed for the first time recently (Yuan et al. 2010 PNAS). Its quasi-linear behavior is quantitatively reproduced by our model. In particular, we show that concave and convex shapes of the torque-speed curve can be achieved by changing the interaction potential from linear to quadratic form. We also show that reversing the stepping rate dependence on force (torque) can lead to non-monotonicity in the speed-load dependency.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.