Paper detail

The Effects of Long Pulse Durations and Radiation Damping in Selective Inversion Recovery Experiments

Long pulse durations necessary in selective inversion recovery (SIR) experiments along with radiation damping (RD) introduce difficulties in quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance measurements, such as those that allow for the determination of a sample's characteristics, including the rates that govern magnetization transfer. Because of these influences, the assumption of perfect inversion is invalid. In this work, we present data that demonstrates that long pulse durations as well as RD cause difficulties in SIR experiments performed on simple one-spin systems, indicating that they will be problematic for multiple-spin systems as well. These results emphasize the importance of understanding the evolution of magnetization for all time points throughout an experiment used in quantitative NMR measurements. Furthermore, experimental parameters must be chosen carefully and understood completely.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.