Paper detail

The effects of lensing by local structures on the dipole of radio source counts

Our peculiar motion in a homogeneous and isotropic universe imprints a dipole in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature field and similarly imprints a dipole in the distribution of extragalactic radio sources on the sky. Each of these effects have been measured, however each of these measurements give different results for the velocity of our motion through the Universe: the radio dipole measurements finds the speed of our motion to be around three times larger than that of the CMB. Here we show the effects of the previously unconstrained lensing dipole, whereby necessarily local structures (required for large angular lensing scales) will distort the distribution of radio sources on the sky. We find that the inclusion of these effects does not reduce the tension between the CMB and radio source dipole measurements however without their inclusion future extragalactic number counts could lead to incorrect inferences of our peculiar motion. In addition we can constrain the size of the lensing dipole to be $κ< 3 \cdot 10^{-2}$ at the $2 σ$ level.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.