Paper detail

The effects of dynamical interactions on planets in young substructured star clusters

We present N-body simulations of young substructured star clusters undergoing various dynamical evolutionary scenarios and examine the direct effects of interactions in the cluster on planetary systems. We model clusters initially in cool collapse, in virial equilibrium and expanding, and place a 1 Jupiter-mass planet at either 5au or 30au from their host stars, with zero eccentricity. We find that after 10Myr 10% of planets initially orbiting at 30au have been liberated from their parent star and form a population of free-floating planets. A small number of these planets are captured by other stars. A further 10% have their orbital eccentricity significantly altered. The change in eccentricity is often accompanied by a change in orbital inclination which may lead to additional dynamical perturbations in planetary systems. The fraction of liberated and disrupted planetary systems is highest for subvirial clusters, but virial and supervirial clusters also dynamically process planetary systems, due to interactions in the substructure. Of the planets that become free-floating, those that remain observationally associated with the cluster (within two half-mass radii of the cluster centre) have a similar velocity distribution to the entire star cluster, irrespective of whether they were on a 5au or a 30au orbit, with median velocities typically 1km/s. Conversely, those planets that are no longer associated with the cluster have similar velocities to the non-associated stars if they were originally at 5au (9km/s), whereas planets originally at 30au have much lower velocities (3.8km/s) than the stars (10.8km/s). These findings highlight potential pitfalls of concluding that (a) planets with similar velocities to the cluster stars represent the very low-mass end of the IMF, and (b) planets on the periphery of a cluster with very different observed velocities form through different mechanisms.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.