Paper detail

The effects of atmospheric entry heating on organic matter in interplanetary dust particles

Interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) were likely major sources of extraterrestrial organics to the early Earth. However, IDPs experience heating to > 500 $°$C for up to several seconds during atmospheric entry. In this study, we aim to understand the effects of atmospheric entry heating on the dominant organic component in IDPs by conducting flash heating experiments (4 s to 400 °C, 600 °C, 800 °C, and 1000 °C) on insoluble organic matter (IOM) extracted from the meteorite Cold Bokkeveld (CM2). For each of the experimental charges, the bulk isotopic compositions of H, N, and C were analyzed using IRMS, the H isotopic heterogeneities (occurrence of hotspots) of the samples were measured by NanoSIMS, and the functional group chemistry and ordering of the IOM was evaluated using FTIR and Raman spectroscopy, respectively. IOM in particles heated to > 600 °C experienced loss of isotopically heavy, labile H and N groups, resulting in decreases in bulk $δ$D, $δ$15N, H/C and, upon heating > 800 °C, in N/C. The H heterogeneity was not greatly affected by flash heating to < 600 °C, although the hotspots tended to be less isotopically anomalous in the 600 °C sample than in the 400 °C sample. However, the hotspots all but disappeared in the 800 °C sample. Loss of C=O groups occurred at 800 °C. Based on the Raman G-band characteristics, the heating resulted in increased ordering of the polyaromatic component of the IOM. The data presented in this study show that all aspects of the composition of IOM in IDPs are affected by atmospheric entry heating. Modelling and temperature estimates from stepwise release of He has shown that most IDPs are heated to > 500°C (Love and Brownlee, 1991; Nier and Schlutter, 1993), hence, atmospheric entry heating is expected to have altered the organic matter in most IDPs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.