Paper detail

The effect of the Fluorescence Yield selection on the energy scales of Auger, HiRes and TA

The fluorescence yield data used for shower reconstruction in the Auger, HiRes and TA experiments are different, not only in the overall absolute value but also in the wavelength spectrum and the various atmospheric dependencies. The effect on the energy reconstruction of using different fluorescence yield parameterizations is discussed. In addition, the impact of a change in the fluorescence spectrum depends on the optical efficiency of the telescopes. A simple analytical procedure allows us to evaluate the combined effect of fluorescence yield and optical efficiency showing a non-negligible deviation between the energy scales of TA and Auger. However no relevant effect is found in the comparison between HiRes and Auger. Finally we show that a similar procedure could also be applied with real data.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.