Paper detail

The Effect of TCP Variants on the Coexistence of MMORPG and Best-Effort Traffic

We study TCP flows coexistence between Massive Multiplayer Online Role Playing Games (MMORPGs) and other TCP applications, by taking World of Warcraft (WoW) and a file transfer application based on File Transfer Protocol (FTP) as an example. Our focus is on the effects of the sender buffer size and FTP cross-traffic on the queuing delay experienced by the (MMORPG) game traffic. A network scenario corresponding to a real life situation in an ADSL access network has been simulated by using NS2. Three TCP variants, namely TCP SACK, TCP New Reno, and TCP Vegas, have been considered for cross-traffic. The results show that TCP Vegas is able to maintain a constant rate while competing with the game traffic, since it prevents packet loss and high queuing delays by not increasing the sender window size. TCP SACK and TCP New Reno, on the other hand, tend to continuously increase the sender window size, thus potentially allowing higher packet loss and causing undesired delays for the game traffic. In terms of buffer size, we have established that smaller buffers are better for MMORPG applications, while larger buffers contribute to a higher overall delay.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.