Paper detail

The Effect of Spatial Correlations on Merger Trees of Dark Matter Haloes

The effects of spatial correlations of density fluctuations on merger histories of dark matter haloes (so-called `{\it merger trees}') are analysed. We compare the mass functions of dark haloes derived by a new method for calculating merger trees, that proposed by Rodrigues \& Thomas (RT), with those given by other methods such as the Block model, the Press-Schechter formula and our own formula in which the mass functions are analytically expressed in a way that takes into consideration the spatial correlations. It is found that the mass functions given by the new method are well fit by those given by our formula. We believe that new method (RT) {\it naturally} and correctly takes into account the spatial correlations of the density fluctuations due to a calculated, grid-based realisation of the density fluctuations and so is very useful for estimating the merger tree accurately in a way that takes into consideration spatial correlations. Moreover, by applying our formula, we present an analytic expression which reproduces the mass function derived by the Block model. We therefore show clearly why and how the mass functions given by the new method and the Block model are different from each other. Furthermore, we note that the construction of merger trees is sensitive to the criterion of collapse and merging of overlapped haloes in cases in which two or more haloes happen to overlap. In fact, it is shown that the mass function is very much affected when the criterion of overlapping is changed.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.