Paper detail

The effect of r-process enhancement in binary CEMP-s/r stars

About half of carbon and s-process enhanced metal-poor stars (CEMP-s) show a high r-process enrichment (CEMP-s/r), incompatible with a pure s-process contribution. CEMP-s stars are of low mass (M < 0.9 Msun) and belong to binary systems. The C and s-process enrichment results from mass transfer by the winds of the primary AGB companion (now a white dwarf). The nucleosynthesis of the r-process, instead, is believed to occur in massive stars exploding as Supernovae of Type II. The most representative r-process element is Eu (95% of solar Eu). We suggest that the r-process enrichment was already present by local SNII pollution in the molecular cloud from which the binary system formed. The initial r-enrichment does not affect the s-process nucleosynthesis. However, the s-process indicators [hs/ls] (where ls is defined as the average of Y and Zr; hs as the average of La, Nd, Sm) and [Pb/hs] may depend on the initial r-enhancement. For instance, the hs-peak has to account of an r-process contribution estimated to be 30% for solar La, 40% for solar Nd, and 70% for solar Sm. A large spread of [Eu/Fe] is observed in unevolved halo stars up to [Eu/Fe] ~ 2. In presence of a very high initial r-enrichment of the molecular cloud, the maximum [hs/Fe] predicted in CEMP-s/r stars may increase up to 0.3 dex. Instead, the spread of [Y,Zr/Fe] observed in unevolved halo stars reaches a maximum of only ~ 0.5 dex, not affecting much the predicted [ls/Fe]. This is in agreement with observations of CEMP-s/r stars that show an observed [hs/ls] in average higher than that observed in CEMP-s. Preliminary results are presented.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.