Paper detail

The effect of peculiar velocities on the epoch of reionization (EoR) 21-cm signal

We have used semi-numerical simulations of reionization to study the behaviour of the power spectrum of the EoR 21-cm signal in redshift space. We have considered two models of reionization, one which has homogeneous recombination (HR) and the other incorporating inhomogeneous recombination (IR). We have estimated the observable quantities --- quadrupole and monopole moments of HI power spectrum at redshift space from our simulated data. We find that the magnitude and nature of the ratio between the quadrupole and monopole moments of the power spectrum ($P^s_2 /P^s_0$) can be a possible probe for the epoch of reionization. We observe that this ratio becomes negative at large scales for $x_{HI} \leq 0.7$ irrespective of the reionization model, which is a direct signature of an inside-out reionization at large scales. It is possible to qualitatively interpret the results of the simulations in terms of the fluctuations in the matter distribution and the fluctuations in the neutral fraction which have power spectra and cross-correlation $P_{ΔΔ}(k)$, $P_{xx}(k)$ and $P_{Δx}(k)$ respectively. We find that at large scales the fluctuations in matter density and neutral fraction is exactly anti-correlated through all stages of reionization. This provides a simple picture where we are able to qualitatively interpret the behaviour of the redshift space power spectra at large scales with varying $x_{HI}$ entirely in terms of a just two quantities, namely $x_{HI}$ and the ratio $P_{xx}/P_{ΔΔ}$. The nature of $P_{Δx}$ becomes different for HR and IR scenarios at intermediate and small scales. We further find that it is possible to distinguish between an inside-out and an outside-in reionization scenario from the nature of the ratio $P^s_2 /P^s_0$ at intermediate length scales.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.