Paper detail

The effect of models of the interstellar media on the central mass distribution of galaxies

We compare the central mass distribution of galaxies simulated with three different models of the interstellar medium (ISM) with increasing complexity: primordial (H+He) cooling down to 10^4K, additional cooling via metal lines and to lower temperatures, and molecular hydrogen (H_2) with shielding of atomic and molecular hydrogen, in addition to metal line cooling. In order to analyze the effect of these models, we follow the evolution of four field galaxies with V_peak < 120 km/s to a redshift of zero using high-resolution Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic simulations in a fully cosmological LCDM context. The spiral galaxies produced in simulations with either primordial cooling or H_2 physics have realistic, rising rotation curves. In contrast, the simulations with metal line cooling and otherwise similar feedback and star formation produced galaxies with the peaked rotation curves typical of most previous LCDM simulations of spiral galaxies. The less-massive bulges and non-peaked rotation curves in the galaxies simulated with primordial cooling or H_2 are linked to changes in the angular momentum distribution of the baryons. These galaxies had smaller amounts of low-angular momentum baryons because of increased gas loss from stellar feedback. When there is only primordial cooling, the star forming gas is hotter and the feedback-heated gas cools more slowly than when metal line cooling is included and so requires less energy to be expelled. When H_2 is included, the accompanying shielding produces large amounts of clumpy, cold gas where H_2 forms. Star formation in clumpy gas results in more concentrated supernova feedback and greater efficiency of mass loss. The higher feedback efficiency causes a decrease of low-angular momentum material. (abridged)

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.