Paper detail

The Effect of Major Mergers on Age and Metallicity Across the Fundamental Plane

Recent low-redshift observations have attempted to determine the star formation histories of elliptical galaxies by tracking correlations between the stellar population parameters (age and metallicity) and the structural parameters that enter the fundamental plane (size and velocity dispersion). These studies have found that velocity dispersion, rather than effective radius or dynamical mass, is the main predictor of a galaxy's stellar age and metallicity. In this work, we apply an analytic model that predicts the structural properties of remnants formed in major mergers to progenitor disk galaxies with properties taken from two different semi-analytic models. We predict the effective radius, velocity dispersion, luminosity, age, and metallicity of the merger remnants, enabling us to compare directly to observations of early-type galaxies. While we find a tight correlation between age and velocity dispersion, we find a stronger dependence of age and metallicity on effective radius than observations report. The correlations arise as a result of the dependence of gas fraction, age, and metallicity on the stellar mass in the progenitor disk galaxies. These dependences induce a rotation in the radius-velocity plane between the correlations with effective radius and circular velocity in the disk galaxy progenitors, and the correlations with effective radius and velocity dispersion in the elliptical galaxy remnants. The differences between our results and those from observations suggest that major mergers alone cannot produce the observed lack of correlation between effective radius and stellar population parameters. Simulations have suggested that subsequent minor mergers introduce scatter in the effective radius while leaving the velocity dispersion essentially unchanged. Incorporating such minor mergers into the model may, then, bring the simulations into closer agreement with observations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.