Paper detail

The effect of Mach number on open cavity flows with thick or thin incoming boundary layers

The Rossiter modes of an open cavity were studied using global linear analysis and nonlinear numerical simulations. The length over depth ratio was two and the Reynolds numbers based on cavity depth were close to 1000. The effect of Mach on such cavities was studied. The global analysis revealed that, in the Mach range 0.1 to 0.9, for thick boundary layers, only R1 and R2 modes could become unstable, whereas for thin boundary layer up to R4 could be unstable. Compressibility was very destabilizing at low Mach. At moderate Mach the instability either saturated with Mach or had an irregular dependence. Analysis of the Rossiter mode eigenfunctions indicated that the acoustic feedback scaled to Ma^3, and explained the strong destabilizing effect of compressibility. The irregular dependence was associated with resonances between Rossiter modes and acoustic cavity modes. The analysis explained why the irregular Mach dependence occurred only for higher order Rossiter modes. In this parameter region three dimensional modes are stable or marginally unstable. Two-dimensional simulations were performed to evaluate how much of the nonlinear regime could be captured by the linear stability results. As the flow became more unstable, an increasing more complex final stage was reached. Yet the spectra present distinct tones that are close to linear predictions. However, a closer look reveals the dominant frequency in the saturated state corresponds to R1 while linear theory predicts R2 as the most unstable mode. This is associated with a nonlinear thickening of the mixing layer in the nonlinear regime. Moreover, the frequencies are much closer to Rossiter empirical predictions than the linear instability ones. Even at these conditions close to critical, the spectra are well described by the mode R1 and a cascade of nonlinearly generated harmonics, with no reminiscence of the linear instability.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.