Paper detail

The effect of foreground subtraction on cosmological measurements from Intensity Mapping

We model a 21 cm intensity mapping survey in the redshift range 0.01<z<1.5 designed to simulate the skies as seen by future radio telescopes such as the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), including instrumental noise and Galactic foregrounds. In our pipeline, we remove the introduced Galactic foregrounds with a fast independent component analysis (fastica) technique. We present the power spectrum of the large-scale matter distribution, C(l), before and after the application of this foreground removal method and calculate the resulting systematic errors. We attempt to reduce systematics in the foreground subtraction by optimally masking the maps to remove high foregrounds in the Galactic plane. Our simulations show a certain level of bias remains in the power spectrum at all scales l<400. At large-scales l<30 this bias is particularly significant. We measure the impact of these systematic effects in two different ways: firstly we fit cosmological parameters to the broadband shape of the power spectrum and secondly we extract the position of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). In the first analysis, we find that the systematics introduce an significant shift in the best fit cosmological parameters at the 2 to 3 sigma level which depends on the masking and noise levels. However, cosmic distances can be recovered in an unbiased way after foreground removal at all simulated redshifts by fitting the BAOs in the power spectrum. We conclude that further advances in foreground removal are needed in order to recover unbiased information from the broadband shape of the power spectrum, however, intensity mapping experiments will be a powerful tool for mapping cosmic distances across a wide redshift range.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.