Paper detail

The effect of channel decoherence on entangled coherent states: A theoretical analysis

We analyse decoherence properties of entangled coherent states (ECSs) due to channel losses, and compare to the performance of bi-photon Bell states. By employing the concept of "entanglement of formation" (EOF), the degradation of fidelity and degree of entanglement are calculated. Two situations are considered: (1) asymmetric and (2) symmetric noise channel. In the first case, only the lower bound of EOF is given. However, in the latter case, we have obtained an explicit expression of concurrence (and then EOF) and found surprisingly our result is just incompatible with that of [Phys. Rev. A \textbf{82}, (2010) 062325] in the limit of $α\rightarrow0$. We demonstrate that entangled coherent states with sufficient small amplitudes are more robust against channel decoherence than biphoton entangled states in both cases.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.