Paper detail

The Effect of Age on the Grouping of Open Clusters: The Primordial Group Hypothesis

The Primordial group hypothesis states that only young enough open clusters (OCs) can be multiple, and old OCs are essentially single since the gravitational interaction between OCs in primordial groups is very weak, and the probability of gravitational capture of two unrelated OCs without disruption is very low. We test such postulate through four different studies using a manual search of Gaia EDR3 and extensive literature. First, we revisit the work of de La Fuente Marcos & de La Fuente Marcos (2009), which states that only ca. 40% of the OCs pairs are of primordial origin. However, no plausible binary system among their proposed OC pairs having at least one member older than 0.1 Gyr has been found. Second, we research among the youngest OCs (age < 0.01 Gyr) in Tarricq et al. (2021) and obtain that ca. 71% of them remain in their primordial groups. Third, a similar study of the oldest OCs (age > 4 Gyr) shows that they are essentially alone. Forth, the well-known case of the double cluster in Perseus is shown also to accommodate the title hypothesis. A simplified bimodal model allows retrieving the overall fraction of linked OCs (around 12-16 %) from our results, assuming that young clusters remain associated ~0.04 Gyr. The obtained results further support that OCs are born in groups (Casado 2021).

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.