Paper detail

The Effect of Accretion Rate and Composition on the Structure of Ice-rich Super-Earths

It is reasonable to assume that the structure of a planet and the interior distribution of its components are determined by its formation history. We thus follow the growth of a planet from a small embryo through its subsequent evolution. We estimate the accretion rate range based on a protoplanetary disk model at a large enough distance from the central star, for water ice to be a major component. We assume the accreted material to be a mixture of silicate rock and ice, with no H-He envelope, as the accretion timescale is much longer than the time required for the nebular gas to dissipate. We adopt a thermal evolution model that includes accretional heating, radioactive energy release, and separation of ice and rock. Taking the Safronov parameter and the ice-to-rock ratio as free parameters, we compute growth and evolutionary sequences for different parameter combinations, for 4.6 Gyr. We find the final structure to depend significantly on both parameters. Low initial ice to rock ratios and high accretion rates, each resulting in increased heating rate, lead to the formation of extended rocky cores, while the opposite conditions leave the composition almost unchanged and result in relatively low internal temperatures. When rocky cores form, the ice-rich outer mantles still contain rock mixed with the ice. We find that a considerable fraction of the ice evaporates upon accretion, depending on parameters, and assume it is lost, thus the final surface composition and bulk density of the planet do not necessarily reflect the protoplanetary disk composition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.