Paper detail

The Edinburgh-Durham Southern Galaxy Catalogue - VIII: The Cluster Galaxy Luminosity Function

We have re-examined the nature of the cluster galaxy luminosity function using the data from the Edinburgh-Durham Southern Galaxy Catalogue and the Edinburgh-Milano Redshift Survey. We derive a best fit luminosity function over the range M(bj)=-18 to -21, for a composite sample of 22 of the richer clusters that has M*=-20.16+/-0.02 and alpha=-1.22+/-0.04. The dominant error in these values results from the choice of background subtraction method. From extensive simulations we can show that when the LF is fitted over this narrow range, it is difficult to discriminate against bright values of M*in the single cluster fits, but that faint values provide a strong test of the universality of the luminosity function. We find that all the individual cluster data are well fit by a Schechter function with alpha fixed at -1.25, and that <=10% of these have fitted values of M* that disagree from the average at the 99% confidence level. We further show that fitting only a single parameter Schechter function to composite subsets of the data can give erroneous results for the derived M*. By considering two parameter fits, the results of Monte-Carlo simulations and direct two-sample chi-squared tests we conclude that there is only weak evidence for differences between the data when broken down into subsets based on physical properties (Bautz-Morgan class, richness, velocity dispersion): from our simulations, only the evidence for a difference between subsets based on velocity dispersion may in fact be significant. We find no evidence at all that a Schechter function is not a good model for the intrinsic cluster luminosity function over this absolute magnitude range. Models that invoke strong evolution of galaxy luminosity of all galaxies within clusters are inconsistent with our results.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.