Abstract

We present an empirical relation between the cold gas surface density (ΣgasΣ_{\rm gas}) and the optical extinction (AV{\rm A_V}) in a sample of 103 galaxies from the Extragalactic Database for Galaxy Evolution (EDGE) survey. This survey provides CARMA interferometric CO observations for 126 galaxies included in the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) survey. The matched, spatially resolved nature of these data sets allows us to derive the ΣgasΣ_{\rm gas}-AV{\rm A_V} relation on global, radial, and kpc (spaxel) scales. We determine AV{\rm A_V} from the Balmer decrement (Hαα/Hββ). We find that the best fit for this relation is Σgas(M⊙pc−2)∼ 26 × AV(mag)Σ_{\rm gas} ({\rm M_\odot pc^{-2}})\sim~26~\times~ {\rm A_V}({\rm mag}), and that it does not depend on the spatial scale used for the fit. However, the scatter in the fits increases as we probe smaller spatial scales, reflecting the complex relative spatial distributions of stars, gas, and dust. We investigate the ΣgasΣ_{\rm gas}/ AV{\rm A_V} ratio on radial and spaxel scales as a function of EW(Hα){\rm EW(Hα)}. We find that at larger values of EW(Hα){\rm EW(Hα)} (i.e., actively star-forming regions) this ratio tend to converge to the value expected for dust-star mixed geometries (∼\sim 30 M⊙ pc−2 mag−1\mathrm{M_{\odot} \,pc^{-2}\,mag^{-1}}). On radial scales, we do not find a significant relation between the ΣgasΣ_{\rm gas}/AV{\rm A_V} ratio and the ionized gas metallicity. We contrast our estimates of ΣgasΣ_{\rm gas} using AV{\rm A_V} with compilations in the literature of the gas fraction on global and radial scales as well as with well known scaling relations such as the radial star-formation law and the ΣgasΣ_{\rm gas}-Σ∗Σ_* relation. These tests show that optical extinction is a reliable proxy for estimating ΣgasΣ_{\rm gas} in the absence of direct sub/millimeter observations of the cold gas.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.