Paper detail

The E-Eigenvectors of Tensors

We first show that the eigenvector of a tensor is well-defined. The differences between the eigenvectors of a tensor and its E-eigenvectors are the eigenvectors on the nonsingular projective variety $\mathbb S=\{\mathbf x\in\mathbb P^n\;|\;\sum\limits_{i=0}^nx_i^2=0\}$. We show that a generic tensor has no eigenvectors on $\mathbb S$. Actually, we show that a generic tensor has no eigenvectors on a proper nonsingular projective variety in $\mathbb P^n$. By these facts, we show that the coefficients of the E-characteristic polynomial are algebraically dependent. Actually, a certain power of the determinant of the tensor can be expressed through the coefficients besides the constant term. Hence, a nonsingular tensor always has an E-eigenvector. When a tensor $\mathcal T$ is nonsingular and symmetric, its E-eigenvectors are exactly the singular points of a class of hypersurfaces defined by $\mathcal T$ and a parameter. We give explicit factorization of the discriminant of this class of hypersurfaces, which completes Cartwright and Strumfels' formula. We show that the factorization contains the determinant and the E-characteristic polynomial of the tensor $\mathcal T$ as irreducible factors.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.