Paper detail

The dynamics of sex ratio evolution: the nature and role of the male subpopulation equilibrium

The classical approaches to the modeling of sex ratio evolution can be divided into two classes. The first class contains the static strategic models related to the Dusing Fisher Shaw Mohler fitness measure, based on the reproductive value of the offspring of the focal female. The second class contains the population genetic models focused on the dynamics of the allele frequencies. The approaches are not fully compatible because the strategic models disregard the role of the male individuals as the passive carriers of the strategy genes. In the previous two papers in this cycle, a new model combining the strategic analysis with more rigorous genetics was presented. The new model shows that sex ratio self-regulation is a multistage complex process which can be regarded as an example of multilevel selection. One of the elements of this process is the dynamic equilibrium between male and female gene carriers associated with convergence of the dynamics to the manifold termed the male subpopulation equilibrium (MSE). This paper attempts to explain this phenomenon and analyze its properties. We show that the MSE phenomenon affects every stage of sex ratio self-regulation (Lemmas 1-4). The MSE plays a crucial role in synchronizing two levels of selection in the double-level selection process. We show that the MSE condition can be generalized as an interesting synergistic property allowing for the estimation of the primary sex ratio of the entire population according to the state of some arbitrarily chosen subpopulation (Lemma 5). We also show that the classical Dusing Fisher Shaw Mohler fitness measure is a biased approximation of the new approach, but that it produces compatible strategic predictions (Lemma 6).

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.