Paper detail

The dynamics of holomorphic correspondences of P^1: invariant measures and the normality set

This paper is motivated by Brolin's theorem. The phenomenon we wish to demonstrate is as follows: if $F$ is a holomorphic correspondence on $\mathbb{P}^1$, then (under certain conditions) $F$ admits a measure $μ_F$ such that, for any point $z$ drawn from a "large" open subset of $\mathbb{P}^1$, $μ_F$ is the weak*-limit of the normalised sums of point masses carried by the pre-images of $z$ under the iterates of $F$. Let ${}^\dagger{F}$ denote the transpose of $F$. Under the condition $d_{top}(F) > d_{top}({}^\dagger{F})$, where $d_{top}$ denotes the topological degree, the above phenomemon was established by Dinh and Sibony. We show that the support of this $μ_F$ is disjoint from the normality set of $F$. There are many interesting correspondences on $\mathbb{P}^1$ for which $d_{top}(F) \leq d_{top}({}^\dagger{F})$. Examples are the correspondences introduced by Bullett and collaborators. When $d_{top}(F) \leq d_{top}({}^\dagger{F})$, equidistribution cannot be expected to the full extent of Brolin's theorem. However, we prove that when $F$ admits a repeller, equidistribution in the above sense holds true.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.