Paper detail

The Dyck bound in the concave 1-dimensional random assignment model

We consider models of assignment for random $N$ blue points and $N$ red points on an interval of length $2N$, in which the cost for connecting a blue point in $x$ to a red point in $y$ is the concave function $|x-y|^p$, for $0<p<1$. Contrarily to the convex case $p>1$, where the optimal matching is trivially determined, here the optimization is non-trivial. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a special configuration, that we call the \emph{Dyck matching}, and to study its statistical properties. We compute exactly the average cost, in the asymptotic limit of large $N$, together with the first subleading correction. The scaling is remarkable: it is of order $N$ for $p<\frac{1}{2}$, order $N \ln N$ for $p=\frac{1}{2}$, and $N^{\frac{1}{2}+p}$ for $p>\frac{1}{2}$, and it is universal for a wide class of models. We conjecture that the average cost of the Dyck matching has the same scaling in $N$ as the cost of the optimal matching, and we produce numerical data in support of this conjecture. We hope to produce a proof of this claim in future work.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.