Paper detail

The Dust-to-Gas Ratio and the Role of Radiation Pressure in Luminous, Obscured Quasars

The absence of high Eddington ratio, obscured Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) in local ($z\lesssim0.1$) samples of moderate luminosity AGN has generally been explained to result from radiation pressure on the dusty gas governing the level of nuclear ($\lesssim10$pc) obscuration. However, very high accretion rates are routinely reported among obscured quasars at higher luminosities, and may require a different feedback mechanism. We compile constraints on obscuration and Eddington ratio for samples of X-ray, optical, infrared, and submm selected AGN at quasar luminosities. Whereas moderate luminosity, obscured AGN in the local universe have a range of lower Eddington ratios ($f_{\rm Edd} \sim 0.001-0.1$), the most luminous ($L_{\rm bol} \gtrsim 10^{46} $erg s$^{-1}$) IR/submm-bright, obscured quasars out to $z\sim3$ commonly have very high Eddington ratios ($f_{\rm Edd} \sim 0.1-1$). This apparent lack of radiation pressure feedback in luminous obscured quasars is likely coupled with AGN timescales, such that a higher fraction of luminous obscured quasars are seen due to the short timescale for which quasars are most luminous. Adopting quasar evolutionary scenarios, extended ($\sim10^{2-3}$pc) obscuration may work together with the shorter timescales to explain the observed fraction of obscured, luminous quasars, while outflows driven by radiation pressure will slowly clear this material over the AGN lifetime.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.