Paper detail

The dust properties of z ~ 3 MIPS-LBGs from photo-chemical models

The stacked spectral energy distribution (SED) of Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) 24$μm$ detected Lyman break galaxies (MIPS-LBGs) is fitted by means of spectro-photometric model GRASIL with an "educated" fitting approach which benefits from results of chemical evolution models. The star formation rate(SFR)-age-metallicity degeneracies of SED modelling are broken by using SFH and chemical enrichment history suggested by chemical models, which also provide dust mass, dust abundance and chemical elements locked in dust component. We derive the total mass $M_{tot}$, stellar mass $M_{\ast}$, gas mass $M_{g}$, dust mass $M_{d}$, age and SFR of the stacked MIPS-LBG in a self-consistent way. Our estimate of $M_{\ast}= 8\times 10^{10}$ agrees with other works based on UV-optical SED fitting. We suggest that MIPS-LBGs at $z\sim3$ are young (0.3-0.6 Gyr), massive ($M_{tot} \sim 10^{11} M_{\odot}$), dusty ($M_{d} \sim 10^{8} M_{\odot}$), metal rich ($Z \sim Z_{\odot} $) progenitors of elliptical galaxies suffering a strong burst of star formation (SFR $\sim 200 M_{\odot}/yr$). Our estimate of $M_{d}=7 \times 10^{7} M_{\odot}$ of the stacked MIPS-LBG is about a factor of eight lower than the estimated value based on single temperature grey-body fitting, suggesting that self-consistent SED models are needed to estimate dust mass. By comparing with the Milky Way molecular cloud and dust properties, we suggest that denser and dustier environments and flatter dust size distribution are likely in high redshift massive star forming galaxies. These dust properties, as well as the different types of SFHs, can cause different SED shapes between high redshift star-forming ellipticals and local star-burst templates. This discrepancy of SED shapes could in turn explain the non detection at submillimeter wavelengths, of IR luminous ($L_{IR} \succeq 10^{12} L_{\odot} $) MIPS-LBGs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.