Paper detail

The Drought-Stress Response of a Drought Resistant Impatiens Processed in PEG-6000 Solution in a Simulation Test

Premise of the Study: Impatiens is a commonly seen garden flower, renowned for its strong adaptability and long history of cultivation. However, seldom has any research touched on its physiological resistance mechanism. In this experiment, the impatiens is selected from those which experienced aerospace mutation and thereafter 12 years of cultivation and breeding. Therefore, it is superior to the non-mutagenized impatiens in terms of drought resistance and demonstrates tremendous differences from the normal impatiens in physiology, which intrigues scholars to search for the underlying reasons . Methods: By reference to Impatiens balsamina L,this experiment uses mutagenized impatiens seeds, processed by PEG-6000 in different solution concentration, to measure the germination rate of impatiens, its relative enzymatic activity and expression differences between gene SoS2 and gene RD29b in the drought lower reaches. Key results: Under simulated drought stress, there is no distinct difference between the mutagenized impatiens and the normal impatiens in terms of germination rate. But by measuring the root tillers and the length, the relative enzymatic activity, MDA, and the expression differences between gene SoS2 and gene RD29b in the drought lower reaches, it is verified that the mutagenized impatiens has more advantages than the normal impatiens, and it Can further cultivate become drought resistance varieties impatiens. Conclusions: In this experiment,which is a positive mutation, the mutagenized impatiens improves drought resistance through radiative mutation. The so obtained impatiens is more pleasing in sight in terms of color and shape and has higher application value in garden virescence.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.