Paper detail

The diversity of spiral galaxies explained

An extensive catalog of spatially-resolved galaxy rotation curves and multi-band optical light profiles for 1752 observed spiral galaxies is assembled to explore the drivers of diversity in galaxy structural parameters, rotation curve shapes, and stellar mass profiles. Similar data were extracted from the NIHAO galaxy simulations to identify any differences between observations and simulations. Several parameters, including the inner slope &#34;S&#34; of a rotation curve (RC), were tested for diversity. Two distinct populations are found in observed and simulated galaxies; (i) blue, low mass spirals with stellar mass M* < 10^9.3 Msol and roughly constant &#34;S&#34;, and (ii) redder, more massive and more diverse spirals with rapidly increasing &#34;S&#34;. In all cases, the value of &#34;S&#34; seems equally contributed by the baryonic and non-baryonic (dark) matter. Diversity is shown to increase mildly with mass. Numerical simulations reproduce well most baryon-dominated galaxy parameter distributions, such as the inner stellar mass profile slope and baryonic scaling relations, but they struggle to match the full diversity of observed galaxy rotation curves (through &#34;S&#34;) and most dark-matter-dominated parameters. To reproduce observations, the error broadening of the simulation&#39;s intrinsic spread of RC metrics would have to be tripled. The differences in various projections of observed and simulated scaling relations may reflect limitations of current sub-grid physics models to fully capture the complex nature of galaxies. For instance, AGNs are shown to have a significant effect on the shapes of simulated RCs. The inclusion of AGN feedback brings simulated and observed inner RC shapes into closer agreement.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.