Paper detail

The Diversity of Planetary Systems Architectures: Contrasting Theory with Observations

We develop a semi-analytical model for computing planetary system formation with the aim of explaining the observed diversity of planetary systems architectures and relate this primordial diversity with the initial properties of the disc where they were born. We adopt different initial conditions based on recent results in protoplanetary discs observations, to generate a variety of planetary systems and analyze them statistically. We explore the relevance of the mass and size of the disc, its metallicity, the mass of the central star and the time-scale of gaseous disc dissipation, in defining the architecture of the planetary system. We also test different values of some key parameters of our model, to find out which factors best reproduce the diverse sample of observed planetary systems. According to this, we predict which systems are the most common in the solar neighbourhood. Our results show that planetary systems with only terrestrial planets are the most common, being the only planetary systems formed when considering low metallicity discs and which also represent the best environment for the developing of rocky, potentially habitable planets. We also found that planetary systems like our own are not rare in the solar neighbourhood, being its formation favoured in massive discs where there is not a large accumulation of solids in the inner region of the disc. Regarding the planetary systems that harbor hot and warm Jupiter planets, we found that this systems are born in very massive, metal-rich discs. Also a fast migration rate is required in order to form these systems. According to our results, most of the hot and warm Jupiter systems are composed by only one giant planet, which is also a tendency of the current observational data.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.