Paper detail

The Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff of the Dynamic Decode-and-Forward Protocol on a MIMO Half-Duplex Relay Channel

The diversity-multiplexing tradeoff of the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol is characterized for the half-duplex three-terminal (m,k,n)-relay channel where the source, relay and the destination terminals have m, k and n antennas, respectively. It is obtained as a solution to a simple, two-variable, convex optimization problem and this problem is solved in closed form for special classes of relay channels, namely, the (1,k,1) relay channel, the (n,1,n) relay channel and the (2,k,2) relay channel. Moreover, the tradeoff curves for a certain class of relay channels, such as the (m,k,n>k) channels, are identical to those for the decode-and-forward protocol for the full duplex channel while for other classes of channels they are marginally lower at high multiplexing gains. Our results also show that for some classes of relay channels and at low multiplexing gains the diversity orders of the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol protocol are greater than those of the static compress-and-forward protocol which in turn is known to be tradeoff optimal over all {\em static} half duplex protocols. In general, the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol has a performance that is comparable to that of the static compress-and-forward protocol which, unlike the dynamic decode-and-forward protocol, requires global channel state information at the relay node. Its performance is also close to that of the decode-and-forward protocol over the full-duplex relay channel thereby indicating that the half-duplex constraint can be compensated for by the dynamic operation of the relay wherein the relay switches from the receive to the transmit mode based on the source-relay channel quality.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.