Paper detail

The distribution of pairwise peculiar velocities in the nonlinear regime

The distribution of pairwise, relative peculiar velocities, $f(u;r)$, on small nonlinear scales, $r$, is derived from the Press--Schechter approach. This derivation assumes that Press--Schechter clumps are virialized and isothermal. The virialized assumption requires that the circular velocity, $V_c \propto M^{1/3}$, where $M$ denotes the mass of the clump. The isothermal assumption means that the circular velocity is independent of radius. Further, it is assumed that the velocity distribution within a clump is Maxwellian, that the pairwise relative velocity distribution is isotropic, and that on nonlinear scales clump-clump motions are unimportant when calculating the distribution of velocity differences. Comparison with $N$-body simulations shows that, on small nonlinear scales, all these assumptions are accurate. For most power spectra of interest, the resulting line of sight, pairwise, relative velocity distribution, $f(u_{\rm r})$, is well approximated by an exponential, rather than a Gaussian distribution. This simple Press--Schechter model is also able to provide a natural explanation for the observed, non-Maxwellian shape of $f(v)$, the distribution of peculiar velocities.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.