Paper detail

The Distribution of Nearby Stars in Velocity Space Inferred from Hipparcos Data

(abridged) The velocity distribution f(v) of nearby stars is estimated, via a maximum- likelihood algorithm, from the positions and tangential velocities of a kinematically unbiased sample of 14369 stars observed by the HIPPARCOS satellite. f(v) shows rich structure in the radial and azimuthal motions, v_R and v_phi, but not in the vertical velocity, v_z: there are four prominent and many smaller maxima, many of which correspond to well known moving groups. While samples of early-type stars are dominated by these maxima, also up to 25% of red main-sequence stars are associated with them. These moving groups are responsible for the vertex deviation measured even for samples of late-type stars; they appear more frequently for ever redder samples; and as a whole they follow an asymmetric-drift relation, in the sense that those only present in red samples predominantly have large |v_R| and lag in v_phi w.r.t. the local standard of rest (LSR). The question arise, how these old moving groups got on their eccentric orbits. A plausible mechanism, known from solar system dynamics, which is able to manage a shift in orbit space involves locking into an orbital resonance. Apart from these moving groups, there is a smooth background distribution, akin to Schwarzschild's ellipsoidal model, with axis ratio of about 1:0.6:0.35 in v_R, v_phi, and v_z. The contours are aligned with the $v_r$ direction, but not w.r.t. the v_phi and v_z axes: the mean v_z increases for stars rotating faster than the LSR. This effect can be explained by the stellar warp of the Galactic disk. If this explanation is correct, the warp's inner edge must not be within the solar circle, while its pattern rotates with frequency of about 13 km/s/kpc or more retrograde w.r.t. the stellar orbits.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.